Reviews for Swift Selection Search
Swift Selection Search by Daniel Lobo
Response by Daniel Lobo
Developer response
posted 7 years agoHi there and thanks for the review! :)
I understand, but it's hard for me to maintain a decent list of search engines up to date for SSS's users, so I prefer if people add their own engines. You can also import the ones you use in the browser. People suggested creating a webpage where users could add the engines they are using, like a Wiki, though that would also have to be moderated and it's really hard to do that in my free time.
Regarding the unnecessary settings, I also don't use most of the options, but almost all were user-suggested via email, GitHub or in reviews, so someone is finding them useful. ;) If you have ideas about what to do about them without removing them, I accept feedback!
Cheers,
Daniel
I understand, but it's hard for me to maintain a decent list of search engines up to date for SSS's users, so I prefer if people add their own engines. You can also import the ones you use in the browser. People suggested creating a webpage where users could add the engines they are using, like a Wiki, though that would also have to be moderated and it's really hard to do that in my free time.
Regarding the unnecessary settings, I also don't use most of the options, but almost all were user-suggested via email, GitHub or in reviews, so someone is finding them useful. ;) If you have ideas about what to do about them without removing them, I accept feedback!
Cheers,
Daniel
699 reviews
- Rated 5 out of 5by yu, a month ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 18968300, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Miltiades, 2 months ago
- Rated 3 out of 5by real5sal, 2 months agoplease add link text support,it is difficult to select link text in many website and no option in right click
- Rated 5 out of 5by Patrick, 3 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Dom, 4 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by atata, 4 months agoIt's great.
However, as the number of search engines I want to use increases, it becomes too large to fit them all.
It would be great if it had a multi-level structure using folders like bookmarks. - Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 17966372, 4 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Ozob, 5 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Leviii, 7 months agoAmazing addon, I have bunch of search engines saved and it prevents me from routing everything through google. Also I have integrated it with everything windows search app which makes it even more useful. Currently development is stalled but it's become irreplaceable for me.
- Rated 5 out of 5by centurion 2000, 7 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by meonmf, 7 months agoThis extension is absolutely fantastic—the intuitive yet powerful interface, the deep customization options, and the full backup and restore features make it a joy to use. Truly impressive work. You've covered it all (except an Android version 😭 though I know there's a fork I can use instead).
- Rated 1 out of 5by Ugarov, 8 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Aissa Jessus, 8 months agoVery effect and clean. Easy and quick to setup and add new search sites and customize them.
I am currently using it heavily for cross sites search and routine custom searches.
Salutes to Authors and Contributors. - Rated 5 out of 5by Damocles, 8 months agoAwsome thank you ! Lot's of settings, it's my favorite addon
- Rated 5 out of 5by Arbeitor, 8 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Leon, 8 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by RichardJT, 10 months agoGood morning , i hope you're well. So, more default SEs nice, but easy enough to add. Sweet, sweet ride!!! Stays open when other tasks need attention; not like bill's menus.
6/5 bc this your only add-on.
7/5 bc i can't see a way to donate for your exceptional effort. C u on github, hopefully.
Peace, r - Rated 5 out of 5by GothicWeasel, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 13247613, a year agoOne of my most used app. Very very helpful. Thanks for making it.